Ask California’s Supreme Court
to Oppose Judicial Terrorism
Days ago, a lone parent petitioned California’s Supreme Court requesting the enforcement of existing state laws against judicial terrorism and domestic violence.
Judicial terrorism — also known as litigation abuse — is a tactic of coercive control often used by perpetrators of domestic violence. Essentially, abusers attempt to weaponize family courts by making false allegations designed to separate victims from their children, and to impoverish them through costly and time-consuming litigation.
While California has passed laws to combat judicial terrorism, these laws have been flagrantly disregarded — first by Ventura County’s family court, then by California’s Second District Appellate Court, also located in Ventura County. Predictably, this has facilitated ongoing domestic violence and child abuse.
Review the evidence for yourself, then record your opposition to this ongoing abuse.
Click here to assist victims of judicial terrorism.
The Basic, Undisputed Facts
Saraa Lee is a licensed social worker and therapist from Los Angeles. She gave birth to Tundra Pasulka in 2017. Troy Pasulka is Tundra’s father.
Saraa separated Tundra from her father in April 2018, in early-2019, in July 2019, in December 2019, and in May 2021. Tundra has not seen her father in-person since the permanent end of Troy and Saraa’s relationship on May 2, 2021; she has not seen him at all since late-2021.
Saraa admitted that she reunited Tundra with her father on December 1, 2019 — the same day she separated the two — because she feared that, if she did not, someone might see the film of actions she took earlier that day. Saraa’s testimony that this film shows her playing with Troy — not choking him — was found not believable. (Saraa did not dispute repeatedly attacking him throughout the remainder of the video — while he held their two-year-old daughter.
Saraa repeatedly expressed her desire to have more children with Troy. She also admitted she wanted to reunite with him in mid-May 2021. In fact, five days before first seeking a domestic violence restraining order against him — on June 2, 2021 — she asked him to move near her, or to at least let her visit him.
Saraa’s DVRO requests have been consistently denied — at least four separate times. All reviewing courts have determined that she presented no evidence that she was ever abused. In addition, he multiple decisions to continue the relationship in 2020 were found to contradict her abuse allegations.
California Family Code Section 3044 places various requirements on courts, with the aim of preventing child abuse, judicial terrorism, etc. Basically, it requires that custody not give custody to abuse such as Saraa. Meanwhile, Section 6344 requires those who file fraudulent abuse litigation to pay the attorneys’ fees of their victims.
Despite Saraa’s filmed abuse, and the documented falsity of her allegations, she was given sole custody of Tundra, Troy was stripped of custody, and Troy’s request that Saraa pay his attorneys’ fees was denied.
When Troy appealed these rulings, California’s Second District Appellate Court issued an opinion denying Troy relief. Their opinion refused to acknowledge the existence of Section 3044, or its undisputed violations, and refused to address any of the evidence proving that Saraa had perjured herself throughout her litigation. Troy’s request for rehearing — the appropriate remedy when an appellate opinion fails to address an appeal’s central allegations — was denied in February 2024 without explanation. Thus, in April 2024, Troy filed a petition for review with California’s Supreme Court.
In May 2024, Troy filed a DVRO outlining Saraa’s years of abuse.
Legal Violations Facilitating Judicial Terrorism
Perjury Re: 2016 – 2018
Saraa attempted to assassinate Troy’s character with an overwhelming amount of false allegations, many of which she ambushed Troy with during hearings, despite having never made such allegations in her official DVRO request. Her single 2016 – 2018 allegation — and the documentary evidence disproving them — is outlined below:
2016 – Mar. 2018: Though Troy and Saraa began dating in 2016, and decided to have a child together in late-2016, Saraa did not describe any abuse that Troy allegedly committed in 2016, 2017, or the beginning of 2018. Her failure to describe any abuse during the initial years of her relationship with Troy was highly suspicious.
Apr. 2018 – Dec. 2018: After the June 2, 2021, denial of her initial DVRO request, she ambushed Troy with a single 2018 allegation — about a Facebook post.
Saraa admitted that, shortly after separating Troy from their daughter in April 2018, she proposed making a Facebook post about their relationship, gave him her password and permission to post whatever he wanted, then left the post he made visible on her account for some time. Legally, these admissions removed any possibility that the post was abusive — especially since the post’s content was not abusive. In fact, Saraa called much of its content “sweet and gentle” compared to the content she had proposed posting.
None of this stopped Saraa from testifying that post was harmful and therefore abusive, and that she had never authorized Troy to make a harmful post. This was exposed as perjury: in her April 2018 private messages, she admitted, “I was willing to hurt myself [with the post.]”
With this abuse allegation disproven by Saraa’s own messages and admissions, she was left with no 2016, 2017, or 2018 allegations. Essentially, she asked a court to believe that Troy — after years of Saraa praising him, their relationship, and his parenting — inexplicably became abusive in 2019. No court has ever believed this nonsensical story.
Perjury Re: 2019
Jan. 2019 – Jun. 2019: D
Jul. 2019 – Dec. 2019: D
Perjury Re: 2020
2020: D
Perjury Re: 2021
Jan. 2021 – Apr. 2021: D
May 2021: D
Jun. 2021 – Dec. 2021: D
Perjury Re: 2022 – 2023
2022: D
Jan 2023: D
Feb. 2023 – Dec. 2023: D
Illegal for Non-Abusive Parent to See Child
Trauma, Mental Health & the Cycle of Abuse
Judicial Terrorism & Corruption
Take Action Against Abuse & Corruption
EJAC (End the Judicial Abuse of Children)
Are you a victim of litigation abuse? If so, click here.
